A statement to the general assembly of OPEC: Sovereignty under threat

Sep 20, 2005 02:00 AM

by Oilwatch

During the 1970s, OPEC achieved a significant turnaround in the correlation of global forces. For the first time ever, the oil-producing countries in the South were in an advantageous position. It managed to limit the colonial model of appropriation of raw materials.
Through a process of nationalization of hydrocarbons and the creation or strengthening of state-owned companies, no other group of countries that produce such strategic raw material had been so successful in controlling its natural resources, both from an economic and a sovereignty point of view.

However, with this triumph, all the member countries of the OPEC entered, at their own risk, into the core of a global technical pattern, created from and for the benefit of the certain countries. They thereby started to have a direct dependence on the global functioning of the industry, its finances and its technical-scientific system. Thus, the possibilities of keeping a favourable alignment of economic forces within the current oil civilization were merely fleeting.
It is no coincidence that most of the technical, economic and social victories achieved by the oil-producing countries of the South, whether or not members of the OPEC, have started to fade away since the mid 1980s, both on sovereignty aspects and in the search for the welfare of the countries that possess such a fundamental resource.

The strategy of the northern countries, and their respective private companies, was centred in the creation of the International Energy Agency (IEA), which has been able -- since 1985 -- to fracture OPEC’s agreements, and to consolidate the mediator function of the transnational oil companies and oil-services providers. In this way, they managed to effectively stop the flow of excess production to the South thus ensuring a huge wastefulness of energy in the countries in the North.
Transnational companies have recovered much of the space they had lost during the 1970s when OPEC was created. They have recovered direct control over the oil companies and deposits, or they have managed to achieve an increasing number of guarantees that allow them to occupy tactical spaces both locally and internationally. As a result, they are currently more influential within OPEC and are re-taking an increasing control over that wealth which they had momentarily lost.

Faced with this situation, most of the state-owned companies, whether or not members of OPEC, have been unable to stop or effectively limit the intervention of the transnational oil companies. On the contrary, the latter are advancing both in the strategic area of services and in the processes of reform and adjustments imposed on our countries by the multilateral banks, fostering the dismantling of the national companies.
Despite OPEC’s initial efforts, once again the transnational companies are deciding the energy policies in all the oil-producing countries in the world. One example would be the fact that the directors of Halliburton, ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco are extremely powerful inside the government of the United States -- the main oil consumer with a huge resource deficit -- and since they are the people who hold all the information on the reserves of the planet, they are the protagonists of the wars for the conquest and control of the resource.

However, with the arrival of the new century, this world that has been created to be the image and resemblance of the oil civilization, is reaching two important limits: first, the global depletion of reserves, especially in small and medium oil-producing countries and secondly, the catastrophic exhaustion of the planet’s environmental ability to support more burning of hydrocarbons.
Faced with an environmental crisis, the companies are preparing their strategies to enter into the business of “alternative” energy and are setting the bases to control the energy market through Public-Private Partnerships and other mechanisms. The fact that the companies that pretend to control oil today are the same companies that are now getting hold over the energy services means that there will be serious economic, social and environmental implications for the southern countries. This is a challenge that OPEC will have to face.
In the meantime, OPEC countries have done little or nothing to enter into the field of research and change to energy alternatives adapted to the characteristics of their own countries, nor have they managed to diversify their economy.

An in-house environmental crisis
We have started the new century with severe environmental problems caused by over consumption of combustible fossils. Climate disasters, which are ever more frequent, intense and uncontrollable, are affecting the planet as a whole.
To the environmental vulnerability faced by OPEC’s members themselves, we need to add a series of steps taken by transnational companies, strong consumer countries and the governments of the member states themselves that are jeopardizing the spirit in which the cartel of producing countries was created in the first place.

Two scenarios where the pieces of the puzzle are moving dangerously against OPEC members are Environment and Economics. The immediate benefits from the policies on crude oil prices and its derivatives are really contradictory to the progressively disastrous effects in the middle and long terms.
OPEC’s country members are already facing the impacts of climate change and pollution linked to the oil civilization. We only need to remember the December 1999 Vargas disaster in Venezuela, caused by totally unpredictable rains, or the forest fires in Indonesia and other countries in the region, caused by droughts. We certainly need to add to these problems the local environmental impacts caused by the extraction, transportation and refining of crude.

Countries with arid and semiarid ecosystems are suffering, due to climate change, an increase in the desertification process; they are losing the little amounts of agricultural lands they have, and their scarce sources of water are being polluted. On their part, countries with rainforests are rapidly losing their biodiversity, a strategic resource, and they are also facing the pollution of their water sources.
In addition, the local impacts of oil activities generate discontent among the population, leading to protests -- legitimate from the communities’ perspective -- which governments must face.

Three countries, members of OPEC, are the main concern of Oilwatch because they are tropical countries with oil production: Nigeria, Indonesia and Venezuela. The situation in these countries is critical, there have been threats of invasion, the sources for survival of the populations are being destroyed, the transnational companies are rapidly gaining space, and they are destroying the resources that will guarantee the well-being of their people in the future.
At present the citizens of these countries have borne unjust and oppressive pressures on the social, ecological, economic and political fronts while the benefits are reaped mostly by the national elite and the transnational oil corporations.

In Nigeria and Indonesia, for example, the citizens experience rising fuel pump prices each time the price of crude oil rises on the world market confirming the curse of crude oil on the people in whose land the resource is extracted. Governments are quick to speak of subsidizing oil costs whereas it is the poor communities whose lands and waters have been colonized by the oil industry who subsidize the cost of oil with even their blood.
Besides that, Indonesia is suffering from the depletion of its reserves, because already one third has been exploited. And what is more serious, is that Indonesia which is the only Asian member of OPEC is considering abandoning its membership, because of the lack of an OPEC policy of protecting its members.

In the case of Venezuela, the mega projects for gas and oil exploitation planned for 2006-2030, and the opening of Venezuela to private transnational companies are incompatible with the proposedpolitical reforms in favour of the people, the sovereignty and the respect for environmental rights and the rights for indigenous people, fishermen and farmers.
Besides that, these plans will accentuate the impacts and risks mentioned above. It is vital for OPEC members to consider the interest of citizens rather than dancing to the shifting strategies of powerful consumer nations and corporations.

Regaining sovereignty, the establishment of a policy of reinvestment and control of excess production, and the setting of conditions to develop a new post-oil civilization, are undoubtedly imperative to achieve the objectives set to protect these countries and their inhabitants.
If not, all these countries will find themselves with a huge ecological and social debt and an accumulation of externalities that no one will know who must pay. Our legacy will be ruinous economic and environmental decadence and dependence, which will be as disastrous as the punishment imposed on these countries by climate change.

For all the above, Oilwatch proposes the following:
-- To open up a national an international dialogue on sovereignty and privatisation, on the short and long term and on social, economic and climate justice.
-- To start a discussion on a post-oil economy, where alternative energies are controlled and provided by States and which can identify solid bases to sustain energy sovereignty and social and economic well-being.
-- To take in the precautionary principle, already included in the most important international conventions, and to start adopting it progressively among OPEC countries and the rest of the nations in the world. A disregard of this subject would mean to move ahead without addressing the problem of an uncertain future.
-- To open up a debate among the tropical countries that are members of OPEC on the broader ecological and economic benefits of safeguarding and keeping our oil reserves as a way to preserve biodiversity and water, respect human rights, contribute to address climate changes and to gear their policies towards sovereign and non oil-dependant nations.
-- To avoid the criminalisation of protests and resistance by local communities who denounce the impacts of oil activities, because they are defending the rights of the people, the countries, and the planet.

For the planet and its people.
Oilwatch
Vienna, September 19, 2005

Oilwatch is a network of civil society organizations in Africa, Asia and Latin America that promotes a post petroleum civilization.

Source: Oilwatch
Alexander's Commentary

Change of face - change of phase

In the period of July 20 till August 3, 2015, Alexander will be out of the office and the site will not or only irreg

read more ...
« November 2019 »
November
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30

Register to announce Your Event

View All Events