Libyan government refuses to approve Verenex deal for CNPC
Chinese energy officials upset at China National Petroleum Corp.'s (CNPC) failed $ 460 mm buyout offer for
Libya-focused Verenex Energy should remember the maxim "what goes around, comes around."
State-run CNPC dropped its offer for Verenex after the Libyan government refused to approve the deal on the grounds
that it wanted to acquire the company instead. But many foreign executives will likely feel that China has little
cause for complaint after three deals involving assets offshore China collapsed over the past 18 months in similar
circumstances.
Among them was Anadarko Petroleum's farm-in agreement with BHP Billiton for an unexplored deep-water block in the
South China Sea. It was scrapped after China National Offshore Oil Corp. withheld approval and -- in an unprecedented
move offshore China -- backed into the block before a well was drilled.
Houston-based Newfield Exploration said last year it also shelved plans to sell its stake in two producing oil fields
in northern China's Bohai Bay despite receiving several offers from would-be buyers. An industry executive said the
sale process was halted after PetroChina insisted it not only had the right to match the $ 100 mm winning bid, but
also buy the assets at a discount. PetroChina is the Hong Kong and Shanghai listed unit of CNPC.
The failure of these deals is important, as it shows how difficult it can be for foreign firms to build a position in
China's rapidly growing energy sector or get a market value for their assets if they wish to sell up. Buyers need to
establish a working relationship with the Chinese so don't want to strike a deal that doesn't have their blessing.
Any plans to develop new oil and natural gas reserves must be approved by the Chinese partner before they are put
before state regulators.
"We have given up on trying to grow a base in China because we think that every time something is available, the
Chinese are going to step in with a kind of weak argument about pre-emption rights and frustrate it," said one
foreign executive.
Foreign executives say they interpret the terms of their production sharing contracts differently from Chinese
partners. They argue that selling or acquiring stock in a local exploration and production unit in China that owns
the assets doesn't represent a change of control or trigger pre-emption rights.
However, an official at CNOOC Ltd. (CEO) says foreign partners have no right to sell without its approval and this
position is shared by other state-run Chinese firms. China's willingness to bring down deals may reflect more the
strides that its state companies have made in technology than any sudden burst of resource nationalism.
Anadarko's deep-water block 43/11 in the South China Sea is next to block 29/26, where Canada's Husky Energy found an
estimated 4 tn to 6 tcf of recoverable natural gas reserves in 2006.
CNOOC sees the South China Sea as a major growth area for the company and is increasingly confident it will soon have
the technology to drill in deep water by itself. Last year, CNOOC's China Oilfield Services Ltd. unit bought Norway's
Awilco Offshore for $ 2.5 bn, gaining access to semisubmersible rigs capable of drilling at depths of 750 meters.
But meddling with deals within its own territory risks giving China an image problem at the same time as it is trying
to expand overseas. Opponents of a planned $ 19.5 bn tie-up between Aluminum Corp. of China, or Chinalco, and
Anglo-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto earlier this year pointedly referred to a lack of reciprocity in China, with
foreign firms hard-pressed to clinch big M&A deals.
China appears to be learning the lesson that interfering with deals doesn't look good. Terry Fern, chairman of
Australia's Petsec Energy, said in May that CNOOC has sent a letter signalling it no longer opposes the possible sale
of his company's 25 % stake in Block 22/12 offshore southern China.
