Survey finds US consumers in an energy-use delusion
by Rosalie Westenskow
As economic concerns deepen, most US consumers want to lower their utility bills, but they also overestimate their
homes' efficiency and underestimate their own energy usage, according to a survey.
Many of those polled in the nationwide survey have taken measures to decrease their monthly bills and save energy.
For example, 73 % always turn off lights, 57 % replaced most incandescent light bulbs in their homes with more
efficient compact fluorescent lights, 57 % purchased Energy Star products and 52 % have renovated their homes to stop
leaks and energy waste.
With all these attempts to save energy, it's not surprising that 53 % of Americans think they're using less energy
than they were five years ago, according to a survey conducted by the Shelton Group, an advertising agency based in
Knoxville, Tennessee.
In reality, though, US electricity consumption has steadily risen, increasing 10 % in the last 10 years, according to
the Department of Energy.
There are anumber of reasons for this apparent contradiction, including the growing number of appliances Americans
consistently use and the "SnackWell's effect," said Suzanne Shelton, president and chief executive of the Shelton
Group.
"A lot of us buy a box of SnackWell's (cookies) and think, 'They're low-fat, so I can eat all of them,' (and) then we
wonder why we haven't lost weight," Shelton said. "Buying an energy-efficient product can create the same type of
effect. We'll say, 'I just got a high-efficiency air conditioner; I can lower the temp and make my home even cooler
in the summer.'"
Behaviours like this may be why a third of survey respondents with energy-efficient products said they had not seen
the return on investment they'd hoped for. Outcomes like that can kill energy-efficiency campaigns and are largely
due to lack of education, Shelton said.
"There's a willingness to be energy-efficient, but there's misinformation about how to do it," Shelton told. That's
because there's no unified, nationalapproach and codified message, she said.
"Sadly, with all the billions of dollars (for energy efficiency) in the stimulus bill, there is nothing set aside for
consumer awareness," Shelton said.
That's not a reflection of federal attitudes toward energy education, though, said David Marks, spokesman for Sen.
Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., chairman of the Senate Energy Committee, which played a key role in drafting the energy
provisions of the recently passed American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
"The stimulus was all about job creation," Marks told. "It needed to be timely and temporary." Education, while
important, wouldn't have advanced the goal of this particular bill, Marks said, because it wouldn't have created many
immediate jobs. However, future energy legislation may take up that issue, he said.
In the meantime, there are already a number of state and federal agencies with a myriad of programs focused on
educating consumers, particularly the Department of Energy and its offshoot, the Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy Office. The department distributes information to the media, creates campaigns targeted toward different
audiences and sponsors public-service announcements, including one in 2007 that featured characters from the Disney
film "Ratatouille."
"Our emphasis is that there are ways to save energy and save on your bills while staying comfortable," said Chris
Kielich, Energy Department spokeswoman. "You can't save 50 % on your bill by doing one thing, but if you do many
things, it certainly does add up."
To help consumers figure out what they can do to cut consumption, the department has set up a number of Web sites,
including energysavers.gov. The site explains how to do a home energy audit and provides information on
energy-efficient appliances, insulation, lighting, windows, water heaters and more. It also outlines ways to finance
products and projects to increase efficiency.
The results of the Shelton Group survey don't necessarily mean these efforts aren't working, Kielich told.
"The fact that someone even did a poll is good because 10 years ago, no one would have thought about it," she said.
Energy efficiency "is really on people's consciousness these days."
Grassroots efforts by utility companies represent a major force driving this interest and changes in consumer
behaviour, both Kielich and Shelton said. Utilities have a major incentive to get their customers to use less, said
Robert Jagusch, director of energy services at the Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association, which includes 125
utility providers in the state.
"The cheapest power plant to build is the one you don't have to build," Jagusch told. "We try to use conservation as
a way to avoid building new power plants."
State laws also prompt power providers to push efficiency. In Minnesota, utilities are mandated to save 1.5 % of
their annual retail electricity sales. To do so, the companies hit the streets.
"For instance, we'll walk into a hardware store that sells energy-efficient light bulbs, but you'll look up and
they've got regular lighting," Jagusch said. "We'll suggest they use their own product, and often they think it's a
great idea; they just never thought about it."
Many utilities also have programs that provide financial assistance for customers, particularly low-income people, to
help them invest in energy-saving projects or products.
"Some of our utilities will... literally pay for and install Energy Star products, like a fridge," Jagusch said.
There're a number of federal programs with the same objective. The recent stimulus bill channelled $ 5 bn into the
Weatherization Assistance Program, a 30-year-old program that has already weatherized 6.2 mm low-income homes. There
are other programs for businesses, manufacturers, builders and people who aren't considered low-income.
The Alliance to Save Energy, a coalition that promotes energy efficiency worldwide, has created a Web site to help
people find and utilize these tax credits at energytaxincentives.org.
The current economic downturn may bring more people to Web sites like this one and increase their willingness to
conserve, but the public and private sectors may have a harder time finding the funds to keep pushing the
energy-efficiency message. For instance, the main sponsor of one of the alliance's campaigns just pulled its
financial support.
"It is tough in this economic condition," said Jessica Lin, communications associate at the alliance.
