Doing the research of the conspiracy against Libya

Dec 22, 2011 12:00 AM

by Liebuster

This contribution is reminding of the many proofs of the conspiracy against Libya for which the world community must hold the culprits in media, politics and international organizations responsible

Leading sources of NATO countries, did confirm that the staged "Libya uprise" was planned long ago and did not come from the Libyan people:
Here my list of sources -- please add more, if you know another:

1. In this interview a defence strategy specialist from the French defence ministry says: at 4:55: "We believe they (USA) decided not to support Gaddafi maybe two years ago (!) and did proceed step by step to the situation we face now."

2. A second confirmation: Interview in 2003 with US General Wesley Clark about US Government plan to invade 7 Arab countries in 5 years Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran:

Political background: US General Wesley Clark: “We got intelligence information, that there is a time window of ten years for wars against former soviet satellite states without Russian intervention”. (

Note: Syria, obviously the next target since the related hate campaign is already finished, has a Russian naval base.
There are other reports of 10th of October 2011 about massive troop concentrations in Latvia on the Russian border, mostly unidentifiable military in mostly black dress, with massive rocket launchers, naval forces, hospital refurbishing etc.

3. 3rd confirmation do a Google search for "Presidential+Study+Directive+11"

OTPOR, The Revolution making Business, consultants for conducting revolutions:

5. A reporter of, Mahdi Nazemroaya in Malta After Libya: At 12:30 "there were (at the beginning) British security forces and the USA had occupied all the upper floors in the Bengasi Hotel to prepare and conduct all the events in Libya".

Even a Dutch NATO-Helicopter was captured at the beginning from obviously loyal Libyan troops: Libya TV Shows Captured Dutch NATO Helicopter Crew:

5.a. Nazemroaya also reports in another interview at
At 11:30 NATO mercenaries in Libya: USA brought in Al Qaeda, France: foreigner legion, UK: 13:06/ 13:30 transitional council people said to me, it was the USA who brought in Al Qaeda. Libyans do not want the Islamists, but the US wants them and is controlling them.

6. Even Italian president Silvio Berlusconi, said according to in a live news clip: 21.43 Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi claims that ousted Libyan leader Muammar was loved by his people and that the rebellion that toppled him was not a popular uprising:
“This wasn't a popular uprising, (like in other north African countries) where the wind of freedom begins to blow. Powerful men decided to give life to a new era by putting out Gaddafi. This wasn't a popular uprising because Gaddafi was loved by his people, as I was able to see when I went to Libya."

7. As you know the German government did not take part in this attack, since attacks are forbidden in the constitution of Germany, but they verbally did support this war. BUT! They did it despite not knowing why.
Because the left party made a parliamentary inquiry what the German government does know about shooting on innocent civilians in Libya -- the answer was: "The federal government (of Germany) has no detailed information about attacks of the Libyan air force against civilians." (!)

Original inquiry and government answer in German:
Anfrage der Fraktion der Linken: Hintergründe des bewaffneten Angriffs auf Libyen
Antwort der Bundesregierung – Drucksache 17/5409 – vom 26. 04. 2011: "Der Bundesregierung liegen keine detaillierten Informationen über Angriffe der libyschen Luftwaffe auf Zivilisten vor."

8. The NATO-rebel leader Hifter, is an CIA agent who lived in the last 20 years near CIA Headquarter in USA:

8.a. Another puppet of a Libyan sleeper government held ready by the USA, was Ali Tarhouni. He long ago got an economics professor sleeper job at Washington University, USA, and in fact today sits in the Libyan-NATO government of the east and did call NATO bombings on his own army and people! See here this new "Libyan finance minister" in an interview about his robbing of the Benghazi Central Bank Libya ($ 750 mm):
An excellent lection of modern neo-colonialism.

9. Leader of one of the main British political parties throws his support behind Al Gaddafi: Nick Griffin MEP in UK says, “It’s not about protecting ‘rebels’ -- this is a war for oil and neo-con colonialism.”

10. Republican Craig Roberts, former vice finance minister of Ronald Reagan, in the magazine „Foreign Policy Journal“ said he believes that "the Anti-Gaddafi-Protests were obviously arranged by the CIA in the east of Libya”.
Source: (in German)

Does really anybody need more confirmation? More reliable and "unbiased" sources? Except no. 5 everything is a NATO source!
OK, here are three more sources:

1. No sign Gaddafi bombed Tripoli -- NATO and UN resolution 1973 wages war on false claims! Each of the three place named in the UN resolution as bombing targets in Tripoli did not show any sign of whatever bombardment.
According to Sukant Chandan of the NGO "British Civilians for Peace in Libya", who came back to UK from monitoring mission in Libya.

2. That there was no bombing in Tripoli has also been confirmed by Christiane Annampur in a report of her US TV news station (ABC?). She was in Tripoli for checking the town by helicopter and also in the town, including a 30 min. or longer interview with M. Gaddafi.

3. Gaddafi airstrikes in Libya did not take place -- Russian military satellite monitoring team

There are also some Libyan proofs, but this is not believed -- but at least that the Libyans ALWAYS ASKED FOR VERIFICATION COMMISSIONS to PROVE THE FALSE CLAIMS and that this was IGNORED is a clear fact that can be proven.
The only air strikes were bombs thrown into the desert between oil installations and the town near Brega in order to stop NATO-rebels from advancing in direction to this important oil facility.

This French defence strategy specialist from the first rt-interview video link above is Eric Denécé, Officier-analyste à la direction de l'Evaluation et de la Documentation Stratégique du Secrétariat Général de la Défense Nationale (SGDN).
In English: Analyst for strategic evaluation and documentation of the general office of French national defence.

Check his interesting biography that shows how competent he is in such matters and what is be done on government levels at
It is in French, so use a Google machine translation.

Alexander's Commentary

Change of face - change of phase

In the period of July 20 till August 3, 2015, Alexander will be out of the office and the site will not or only irreg

read more ...
« May 2020 »
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Register to announce Your Event

View All Events